Financial ties
Documented financial interests and where they intersect official actions — facts, not allegations.
Standing rule: no scores. Color marks whether something is in force, reversed, contested, concluded, or permanent — not good or bad.
- Color is a legal fact, not an opinion. It shows — whether something is still in force, was reversed, or is contested in court — never whether it was good or bad.
- Every number links to its source and to how strongly it can be tied to the action () — click any figure to see the full evidence.
- Nothing here is scored, graded, or ranked. When two credible sources disagree, this archive shows both numbers instead of picking one.
- Wins are in here too. See or filter the Ledger by .
This is the archive’s most careful page, on purpose. It records documented financial facts and, where a holding sits alongside an official action, states that adjacency — the holding, the disclosure, the action, each with a source. It does not allege corruption, a motive, or a quid pro quo; those are conclusions for the reader, not claims the archive makes. Where the government discloses a value in rather than exact figures, the band is used. And where a disclosure is missing, that absence is shown as a fact of the record, not left blank.
This dataset is deliberately small. A row appears only where the underlying filing or document was retrieved and read, because an error here is more costly than a gap. The limit is not that the filings are unreadable — they are. It is that deciding which of several hundred disclosed holdings belongs in an archive about official actions, and whether one sits close enough to a documented action to be worth stating, is a judgment about relevance and fairness that a person should make. Where a disclosure is missing, that absence is recorded as its own row rather than left out.
Disclosed in a filing (1)
An interest the officeholder reported on a public financial disclosure. The filing is the source, and OGE reports holdings in bands rather than exact figures.
Retained ownership of the Trump Organization while in office, disclosed in the annual public financial disclosure. The President is statutorily exempt from the conflict-of-interest rule that binds other executive-branch officials — a legal fact the archive records without characterizing.
OGE Form 278e discloses assets and income in bands, not exact figures; the filing itself is the record.
The same retained ownership is the subject of the emoluments litigation documented in that entry.
Two documented facts that touch (2)
Two separately sourced facts that sit next to each other in time or subject. The archive states that they do. It does not say one explains the other, and no motive is asserted or implied.
Presidential-family cryptocurrency ventures were launched during the same period in which the administration set federal crypto policy — a strategic bitcoin reserve by executive order and the first federal stablecoin statute. The overlap and the President's statutory conflict-of-interest exemption are both documented; the ethics scrutiny they drew remains unresolved.
The federal crypto policy this overlaps is the action documented in the crypto entry, which records the overlap and leaves the judgment to the reader.
Foreign and domestic government payments to Trump-owned properties during the first term generated Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clause litigation. The constitutional question was never resolved on the merits: the Supreme Court vacated the appellate rulings as moot after the term ended (Trump v. CREW).
A disclosure that is missing (1)
A disclosure that the record shows was not made, or not made public. The absence is the fact being reported; nothing is inferred from it about what the missing filing would have said.
The absence is itself part of the record: in a June 2025 letter, Senator Adam Schiff stated that new-entrant public financial disclosure reports (OGE Form 278e) for senior White House officials had not been made publicly available past the statutory deadline under the Ethics in Government Act. This is attributed to the letter, not asserted by the archive.