Dossiers
The four threads too big for a single card — told in full, in sequence.
Standing rule: no scores. Color marks whether something is in force, reversed, contested, concluded, or permanent — not good or bad.
- Color is a legal fact, not an opinion. It shows — whether something is still in force, was reversed, or is contested in court — never whether it was good or bad.
- Every number links to its source and to how strongly it can be tied to the action () — click any figure to see the full evidence.
- Nothing here is scored, graded, or ranked. When two credible sources disagree, this archive shows both numbers instead of picking one.
- Wins are in here too. See or filter the Ledger by .
Four threads too big for one ledger row. Each is told the same way: what happened, what is settled, what is still open, then both sides at their strongest.
Project 2025: the disavowal and the record
He said he knew nothing about it. What is actually documented?
A 920-page governing blueprint, published by the Heritage Foundation in April 2023, written with contributions from more than 100 conservative organizations and dozens of former Trump officials. During the 2024 campaign he said he knew nothing about it. Roughly half of its executive-action agenda is now initiated or complete. Both of those statements are documented, and the space between them is what this dossier covers.
What happened, in sequence
Settled — not in dispute
Open — the evidence does not settle it
The strongest version of each side
DOGE: $2 trillion promised, $215 billion claimed, and what the audit found
Did it save money? A federal audit answered that two days ago.
The Department of Government Efficiency was created on the first day of the second term and shut down on July 4, 2026. It promised $2 trillion in savings, claimed $215 billion, and on August 6, 2026 the Government Accountability Office reported that a large share of the audited portion of that figure was overstated, unverifiable, or never happened. The workforce reduction, however, was real and measurable — which is why this dossier has two halves that do not cancel out.
What happened, in sequence
Settled — not in dispute
Open — the evidence does not settle it
The strongest version of each side
Interior enforcement: the 92% drop, and the custody record
The clearest success and the gravest allegations are in the same policy.
This is the entry where the archive’s refusal to score is doing the most work. The administration’s central claimed achievement — a 92% fall in southern border apprehensions — is real and measured. So is a record number of deaths in immigration custody. Neither figure cancels the other, and no honest presentation lets one of them stand in for the whole.
What happened, in sequence
Settled — not in dispute
Open — the evidence does not settle it
The strongest version of each side
The tariffs: collected for a year under an authority the Court says never existed
What happens when a policy is struck down after the money is already collected?
Tariffs imposed under emergency powers in February and April 2025 were ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court on February 20, 2026 in a 6–3 decision. Collection ceased two days later. A replacement was proclaimed under a different statute the same day. Up to $175 billion in refunds may be owed, and the mechanism for paying them is unresolved.